I think that is a pretty fare accessment. -- Maroon Doom 07/25/2016 04:05AM
Keep trying. You on the Gboro payroll? -- chuckd4vt 07/23/2016 2:12PM
More Chuck World musings to spin the unspinnable... ** -- marcbvtgm 07/25/2016 10:49AM
No spin when comparing a profitable network against a nonexistant "network" -- chuckd4vt 07/26/2016 12:50PM
Correct...you just don't get it. ** -- marcbvtgm 07/27/2016 12:50PM
I nominate this for post of the year ** -- ren_hoek 07/25/2016 8:27PM
Agree to disagree with you Charles ** -- VaTechHokiesACC 07/24/2016 02:42AM
Deleted -- ahokie4u 07/23/2016 10:57PM
Not many consider it a success -- ahokie4u 07/23/2016 5:35PM
Big difference between unsuccessful and not as successful as hoped. . -- chuckd4vt 07/23/2016 11:31PM
The Pac12 N has been profitable for years. Better than nothing. -- chuckd4vt 07/23/2016 11:13PM
So you trash, but nevertheless agree with my analysis. ** -- daveinop 07/24/2016 10:27AM
You presented absolute worst case scenario for Pac12 Network. -- chuckd4vt 07/24/2016 8:54PM
Same as yours -- daveinop 07/25/2016 08:16AM
Nobody knowledgeable considers PAC12N a success -- ren_hoek 07/23/2016 4:43PM
Isn't success relative? -- Atlee Hokie 07/24/2016 03:55AM
It's primary success to date has been exposure. It isn't clear if the -- daveinop 07/24/2016 11:04AM
Irrelevant. It's made a ton more dough than any ACCN. Correct? ** -- chuckd4vt 07/23/2016 11:18PM
It's irrelevant that experts think the PACN is underwhelming? -- ren_hoek 07/26/2016 11:18AM
Only if you ignore the initial capital outlay ** -- daveinop 07/25/2016 11:42AM
Even their biggest corporate sponsor doesn't carry it -- mrcaniac 07/23/2016 6:50PM
Which only speaks to their impressive potential moving forward. ** -- chuckd4vt 07/23/2016 11:14PM